Breast checks made easy? About time!
Wednesday, July 30th, 2008In the near future, women might be able to avoid painful mammograms by the use of an alternative device that takes a thorough look at breast tissue without compressing it, causing undue pain to the patient.
Believe me: A typical mammogram hurts, and the new digital mammograms feel just about the same as the more traditional type. I’ve had a few of these tests by now (age 50), and I believe there’s been no improvement in comfort.
There certainly are nice nurses who rush to get the X-ray taken, and also keep up a friendly chatter while the patient waits, freezing in one of those drafty tie gowns. There are perky office personnel who take appointments and manage billing procedures, etc.
There remains a certain amount of hysteria and a whole lot of angst when in comes to women and the topic of breast cancer. Cold, hard statistics fortunately show both the incidence rate and death rate are going down.
According to the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, breast cancer among women has decreased 3.5 percent each year, from 2001 to 2004. Deaths from breast cancer decreased by 2.2 percent each year, from 1990 to 2004. But 200,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer each year, making it the second most common type of cancer that women get. (Skin cancer is most common.)
Nevertheless, most women my age know at least one person who’s had the disease, and one who has died from it. It gets complicated because most women I know also dread the mammogram test, and do not do the monthly breast exam.
Here’s welcome news on both topics:
1. Painless mammograms: A new procedure, called dedicated breast computed tomography, or CT scan, requires a woman to lie face down on a special table with one breast suspended through an opening. A CT scan rotates around the breast and collects data that is reconstructed into a three-dimensional image. Total radiation dose is the same as a conventional mammogram.
This alternative is being presented at a conference this week, to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Clinical trials show the prototype is good at finding masses, but not so effective at detecting tiny clusters of calcium that can sometimes signal breast cancer.
Researchers will not make the claim that this device is better than the more typical one.
2. Self-exams debunked. Many doctors recommend self tests despite little evidence of benefit. New research shows that in the end, self-exams do women more harm than good.
A review of two studies involving nearly 400,000 women in Russia and China found that those who performed self-exams underwent almost twice as many biopsies (invasive procedures that remove fluid or tissue that is then analyzed for signs of cancer) that did not find tumors as women who did not examine themselves. There was no meaningful difference in the two groups’ death rates.
Note: I’m interested in speaking to a woman who uses a specific type of contraceptive, introduced to the public in the last few years. If you use Implanon, or either the Mirena or Paragard IUD, I’d like to ask about your experience. Contact me by e-mail (dbaker@qctimes.com), telephone (563/383-2492), or as a comment on this blog.
Healthbeat by Deirdre Cox Baker